Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,296
Callier v. Bykhovsky et al
as 2:2024cv01003
Plaintiff: Brandon Callier
Defendant: Alexander Bykhovsky and Alex Gold Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01377
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dooley v. Newmont USA Limited, et al.
as 24-3241
Plaintiff: LEROY DOOLEY
Defendant: NEWMONT USA LIMITED and NEVADA GOLD MINES, LLC
Trupia v. Heritage Hard Assets LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff: Anthony Trupia
Defendant: Heritage Hard Assets LLC, Kyle Patton, HLV Ventures and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dallas Food & Beverage LLC et al v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 3:2024cv01151
Plaintiff: Dallas Food & Beverage LLC doing business as Bucks Cabaret, 2345 Meacham, LLC doing business as Bucks Cabaret, 11000 Reeder LLC doing business as Bucks Wild and others
Defendant: United States Small Business Administration, Isabel Casillas Guzman, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gold-Smith v. Will County et al
as 1:2024cv03856
Plaintiff: Robert Gold-Smith
Defendant: Will County, Joseph Grozik, Policandriotis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Shadija v. Apollo Manufacturing Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03502
Plaintiff: Dhiraj Shadija
Defendant: Apollo Manufacturing Inc., Alaska Gold Trading Company, Jai Sadhwani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gold Key Processing, Inc. v. Trico Products Corporation
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff: Gold Key Processing, Inc. doing business as HEXPOL Middlefield
Defendant: Trico Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
G. et al v. Blue Cross of California et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: R. G. and A. G.
Defendant: Blue Cross of California doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Anthem Gold PPO Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
G. et al v. Blue Cross of California et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Plaintiff: R. G. and A. G.
Defendant: Blue Cross of California doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Anthem Gold PPO Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?