Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Clark et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Michele Clark
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
Lennox Industries, Inc. , Saint-Gobian Abrasives Inc. , Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., AWC 1997 Corporation, Advanced Composites Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clark et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00995
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation , Advanced Composites Group, Aii Acquisitions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John Clark and Michele Clark
Cross_claimant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Ameron International Corp. , Chicago Bridge & Iron Company , AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Surita et al v. AM General LLC et al
as 1:2015cv07164
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Blain's Farm & Fleet, DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Surita and Rojelio Surita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kelleher v. Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2015cv00893
Defendant:
Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleher
Cross Defendant:
Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Rohr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hubert et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2015cv00617
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, AERCO International, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Hubert and Patrica Hubert
Cross_claimant:
Velan Valve Corporation , General Electric Company , ITT Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, AERCO International, Inc., API Heat Transfer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tucker et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joe Donald Tucker and Cora May Tucker
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., All Acquisitions, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00140
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, Ameron International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ellis
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , The Gorman-Rupp Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Co. , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Nesser et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nesser and Karen Nesser
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Allied Manfacturing, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , AERCO International, Inc., Advanced Composites Group and others
Cross_claimant:
ITT Corporation and Crane Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant:
Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant:
Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant:
Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Watts v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Steven Watts
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Carver Pump Company , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , York International Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Steven Watts , Carver Pump Company , 84 Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
