Cases 11 - 20 of 1,985
Hartfield v. USA
as 3:2024cv01802
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory Antonio Hartfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sims v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv01793
Defendant:
Gregory Scott and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Christy Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hagmann v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 3:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hagmann
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Diarra v. George W. Bush et al
as 4:2024cv02501
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Dr. Stacy Brown, Sgt. Friday and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa U'nfa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chappell v. Hillhouse
as 6:2024cv00222
Respondent:
Sheriff Botie Hillhouse
Petitioner:
Gregory Cash Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Damm v. The State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Gregory Paul Damm
Respondent:
Dallas County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hayes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02291
Petitioner:
Gregory Hayes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Defendant:
TDCJ Jordan Unit, Tammy Shelby, Aventiv Technologies and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harrison and Gregory Jay Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
