Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Fiorito et al v. Woods et al
as 1:2020cv01859
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal, Warden William Woods and David Brewer
Petitioner:
Michael Fiorito and The Estate of Robyn Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grubbs et al v. CHC Jonesboro LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02656
Defendant:
John Doe One, John Doe Two and CHC Jonesboro LLC
Plaintiff:
Jakiyah Grubbs and Tujuana Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. Grubbs et al
as 1:2019cv02047
Defendant:
City of Atlanta/Atlanta Police Dept., Officer J. Grubbs, Atlanta Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blasingame and Keith Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moss v. Foster et al
as 1:2019cv01517
Defendant:
Judge Adele Grubbs, Chinwe N. Foster, Jane Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
David Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grubbs v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03849
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Darrell Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Park at Tara Lake Owner LLC v. Grubbs
as 1:2018cv03178
Plaintiff:
Park at Tara Lake Owner LLC
Defendant:
Shakaa Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grubbs v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02352
Plaintiff:
Stephen Grubbs
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newmark Realty Capital, Inc. v. BGC Partners, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01581
Defendant:
Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc., BGC Partners, Inc. and Newmark & Company Real Estate, Inc. doing business as Newmark Grubb Knight Frank
Respondent:
Voya Investment Management and Gregory Michaud
Plaintiff:
Newmark Realty Capital, Inc.
Einfeldt v. Mackelburg et al
as 1:2017cv04820
Petitioner:
Michael Einfeldt
Respondent:
Mackelburg, Vasquez, Cornejo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daker v. Keaton et al
as 1:2016cv03745
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Rebecca Keaton, Jay E. Stephenson, Lisa Blalock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
