Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Y.G., v. State of Oregon, et al
as 3:2019cv01870
Plaintiff:
Y.G., a minor child, by and through his Next Friend, Steven J. Russell and Y G,
Defendant:
STACEY DAESCHNER, FARIBORZ PAKSERESHT, THE STATE OF OREGON, by and through its DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Nelson et al
as 2:2019cv01210
Defendant:
Jose Olvera, Steve Boston, Michelle Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00064
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moret v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 6:2018cv01105
Defendant:
Andrea Dailey, Oregon State Hospital and Poornima Ranganathan
Plaintiff:
Andrew Guy Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duclairon v. LGBTQ Community & Grace Community Church Klan et al
as 3:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ernst Duclairon
Defendant:
Gabrielle Franklin, Guy Franklin, LGBTQ Community & Grace Community Church Klan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Barber et al v. Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00855
Defendant:
Alabama, Arkansas, California and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jay Barber, Chad Dykehouse, Jay David Leatherwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonneau v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2018cv00518
Plaintiff:
Merrick Bonneau
Defendant:
Officer Castaneda, Christopher Devlin, Guy Gino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2018cv00301
Defendant:
Bob Gross, Guy Knight, Joshua Marque and others
Plaintiff:
David-Paul Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
