Cases 11 - 20 of 23
BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2018mc00086
Respondent:
ANNEKA P. COLLINS, JULIE A. HORNE, CLERK OF COURT and others
Petitioner:
MAURA M. ROLL, MISTY C. BRICKLES, R. LOTUS JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
VAN ALLEN v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., JOHN J. FASO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2017cv01894
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. ADAMS
Defendant:
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, R. GUY COLE, COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Christopher Barksdale v. USA, et al
as 16-5212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Scott Barksdale
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Stuart F. Delery, John D. Bates and others
BARKSDALE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01120
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BARKSDALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STUART F. DELERY, JOHN D. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
EALY v. COLE et al
as 1:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. EALY, SR.
Defendant:
R. GUY COLE, KARL S. FORESTER, EUGENE EDWARD SILER, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Hudson v. Tarnow et al
as 2:2013cv12604
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hudson
Defendant:
Arthur J Tarnow, Bernard Freidman, Paul Komives and others
John Sandles v. Clay, et al
as 12-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC L. CLAY, JOHN M. ROGERS, JAMES L. GRAHAM and others
John Sandles v. Chastang, et al
as 12-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee:
RITA C. CHASTANG, SARAH RESNICK COHEN, GEORGE C. STEEH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
