Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Broadhead v. Palmer et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00529
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Milton Palmer, Timothy Scott, V. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Fitzpatrick et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00484
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
T. Fitzpatrick, S. Halliam, M. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Holcey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Michael Holcey, M. Foster, P. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Smith
as 1:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Damon Elijah Gardner
Defendant:
Robert H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Roders et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
E. Roders, Officer Holincey, Earnestine Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Roders et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00321
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
LPN Roders, Officer Holincey, Earnestine Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Billips et al
as 6:2014cv01907
Petitioner:
Troy H. Smith
Respondent:
Phyllis Billips and Attorney General Office State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2011cv02779
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Smith
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abernathy et al v. Church of God et al
as 4:2011cv02761
Plaintiff:
Robert Glenn Abernathy , Brenda G. Abernathy , Verlon Bagwell and others
Defendant:
Church of God , Southern New England Region for the Church of God, Inc., Celestial Praise Church of God, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
