Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Barrera et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11624
Plaintiff:
Erick Schmidt, Paul Carney, Walter Lopez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Albrecht et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11431
Plaintiff:
Zia Ziprin, Felix Rene Meier, Chenenne Guevarra Francis and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Stokes, Jr. v. Wayne County et al
as 6:2018cv06203
Plaintiff:
Richie A. Stokes, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne County , Wayne County Sheriff's Office , Deputy Thomas D'Amato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harkins v. Hobart et al
as 1:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Harkins
Defendant:
Richard Hobart, Travis Wilber and City of Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Fischer et al
as 9:2015cv01458
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner Fischer, Superintendent Harkin, Cpt. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Harkins et al
as 1:2015cv05011
Plaintiff:
Derrick Bowen, Jr.
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel For The City Of New York
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and James Harkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harkins v. Colvin
as 7:2015cv05223
Plaintiff:
Arthur Harkins
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
harkins v. Colvin
as 7:2015cv05220
Plaintiff:
arthur harkins
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Campbell v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01445
Plaintiff:
Richard Campbell
Defendant:
Police Officer "John" Duncan, James Harkins, Police Officer Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lee v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv02001
Plaintiff:
Ji Young Lee
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Walter Harkins, Joseph Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
