Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Harrell v. Vertical Brands Media Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01280
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrell
Defendant:
Vertical Brands Media Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harrell v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lana Harrell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Klein v. Rios et al
as 5:2012cv01292
Plaintiff:
Quinn Aaron Klein
Defendant:
H A Rios, Jr, Capt Jones, Lieutenant Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier et al v. Raygoza-Huerta et al
as 5:2012cv00833
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Frazier , Shannon Frazier and Ordalia Frazier
Defendant:
Manuel Raygoza-Huerta , Straightway Construction Services LLC , James A Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Laverty v. Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc
as 5:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jerald Lynn Laverty and Harrel's LLC
Defendant:
Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavler v. Harrell
as 6:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ella Georgina Peavler
Defendant:
Marvin Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. Dillard's, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00800
Plaintiff:
Toquyen T Harrell
Defendant:
Dillard's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. Cookson Hills Community Action Foundation, Inc.
as 6:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
Michael Cleon Harrell
Defendant:
Cookson Hills Community Action Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Maurek v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
Gregory Maurek
Defendant:
Lawton City of, William C Riley, Fred C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Henry et al
as 5:2008cv01053
Plaintiff:
Misty Williams
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Howard H Hendrick, Mary Williams and others
Guardian Ad Litem:
D Kent Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
