Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Nadezhda Jones v. Mark Ghaly, et al
as 22-15749
Plaintiff / Appellant: NADEZHDA JONES
Defendant / Appellee: MARK GHALY, as Secretary of California Health and Human Services Agency, WILL LIGHTBOURNE, as Director, California Department of Health Services, CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY and others
Nadezhda Jones v. Regents of the University of California, et al
as 22-15750
Plaintiff / Appellant: NADEZHDA JONES
Defendant / Appellee: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BIANA ROYKH, WILL LIGHTBOURNE, as Director, California Department of Health Services and others
Smith et al v. Watanabe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv07872
Plaintiff: Grace Smith, Russell Rawlings and California Foundation for Independent Living Centers
Defendant: Mary Watanabe, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGED HEALTH CARE, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Jones v. Regents of the University of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv07844
Plaintiff: Nadezhda Jones
Defendant: Regents of the University of California, Biana Roykh, Will Lightbourne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calm Ventures LLC v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55892
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALM VENTURES LLC, a California limited liability company, DBA Pineapple Hill Saloon & Grill
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Govenor of California, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California and ERICA S. PAN, M.D., M.P.H., in her official capacity as the Acting State Public Health Officer for the California Department of Public Health, State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
Images Luxury Nail Lounge, Inc, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55890
Plaintiff / Appellant: IMAGES LUXURY NAIL LOUNGE, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge, SUMMIT FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge and NTDH HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation, DBA Images Luxury Nail Lounge
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Govenor of California, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California and ERICA S. PAN, M.D., M.P.H., in her official capacity as the Acting State Public Health Officer for the California Department of Public Health, State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
Bella N Harmony, Inc. v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55889
Plaintiff / Appellant: BELLA N HARMONY, INC., a California corporation, DBA Joyce Marie of Beverly Hills
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Govenor of California, ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California and ERICA S. PAN, M.D., M.P.H., in her official capacity as the Acting State Public Health Officer for the California Department of Public Health, State of California-Health and Human Services Agency
Jones v. Ghaly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv05828
Plaintiff: Jones Nadezhda and Nadezhda Jones
Defendant: Mark Ghaly, Will Lightbourne, California Health and Human Services Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Bernhard et al v. County of San Joaquin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00948
Plaintiff: Lloyd Thomas Bernhard, II and Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero
Defendant: County of San Joaquin, Danevia Rhone, Leslie Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez-Perez v. County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00564
Defendant: County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency, Alba Marquez, Katherine Manno and others
Plaintiff: Gregorio Fernandez-Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?