Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Cambridge Heights v. Bigby
as 1:2018cv04477
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Heights
Defendant:
Chasity Bigby
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Princeton Height Apartments et al v. Beulah
as 1:2018cv04273
Defendant:
Prosperity Beulah
Plaintiff:
Princeton Height Apartments and First Communities Mgmt Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pascal v. Massage Heights Brookhaven et al
as 1:2018cv04026
Plaintiff:
Mirlande Pascal
Defendant:
John Does I-V, Massage Heights Brookhaven, Yakeisha E. Welch and others
National Trust Insurance Company v. Sabra Chamblee Heights, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00741
Plaintiff:
National Trust Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sabra Chamblee Heights, LLC and WHW Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Princeton Height Apartments et al v. Mobley
as 1:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Princeton Height Apartments and First Communities Mgmt Inc.
Defendant:
Saquna L. Mobley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
API Magnolia Heights GPLLC v. Keys
as 1:2017cv05149
Defendant:
Latrice Keys
Plaintiff:
API Magnolia Heights GPLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Height v. Olens et al
as 4:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Height
Defendant:
Samuel L. Olens, State of Georgia, Walter Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. et al v. Monroe Heights Development Corp., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00231
Defendant:
Monroe Heights Development Corp., Inc, Monroe Heights Development Corp., Inc. and John Habjan
Plaintiff:
U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc, U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc. and Microtel Inns and Suites Franchising, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Height v. Berry
as 3:2015cv00090
Petitioner:
Marvin Lee Height
Respondent:
Walter Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
