Cases 11 - 20 of 30
LEMON v. KRAMER et al
as 1:2016cv02025
Plaintiff:
ARRON FREDERICK LEMON
Defendant:
MARY MORTON KRAMER , TIMOTHY JOHN MCCRONE , LENORE ROSALIE GELFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C. ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP v. S2 THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00906
Plaintiff:
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Defendant:
S2 THERAPEUTICS, INC. and VATRING HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COATES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00449
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY COATES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEVIN ROSS, THOMAS CADDELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CIACCI v. DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, JUDGE THOMAS P. HOGAN et al
as 1:2013cv01666
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, JUDGE THOMAS P. HOGAN and ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNGER v. MCAVOY et al
as 1:2013mc01205
Petitioner:
GLENN RICHARD UNGER
Respondent:
THOMAS J. MCAVOY, GARY SHARPE, RANDOLPH TREECE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
CIACCI v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2012cv01264
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, THOMAS P. HOGAN, MANCHESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIACCI v. HOGAN
as 1:2012cv01031
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
THOMAS HOGAN, MICHAEL RYAN, GEORGE LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
