Cases 11 - 20 of 32
FAGAN-ELLISON v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
as 1:2020cv01951
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC D/B/A CVS and HOOK-SUPERX, LLC doing business as CVS
Plaintiff:
SHARON FAGAN-ELLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Downs et al v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 3:2019cv01125
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Renaissance Maintenance Inc, Renaissance Maintenance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Downs and Duane Downs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOPTON v. CVS HEALTH et al
as 2:2019cv00531
Defendant:
CVS CORPORATION, CVS HEALTH and HOOK-SUPERX, LLC.
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY MARLENE HOPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK-BATES v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
as 1:2019cv04283
Plaintiff:
Karen Cook-Bates
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC D/B/A CVS PHARMACY and HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kehr v. Hook-SupeRx LLC
as 3:2019cv00880
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC d/b/a CVS PHARMACY #16778 and Hook-SupeRx LLC
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R. KEHR, SHERRY A. KEHR, Steven R Kehr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KIZER v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01960
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX LLC, VALLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. and HOOK-SUPERX LLC doing business as CVS PHARMACY
Plaintiff:
STEVE KIZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FAULKNER v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
as 4:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Hook-SupeRx LLC
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY FAULKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAULKNER v. HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
as 1:2018cv02247
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC D/B/A CVS PHARMACY and HOOK-SUPERX, LLC
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY FAULKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlile v. Hook-SupeRx, LLC
as 2:2018cv00021
Estate_plaintiff:
David Carlile
Defendant:
Hook-SupeRx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler County Board of Commissioners v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45037
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Butler County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
