Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Brown v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deunta Brown
Defendant:
Shawn Emmons, Hays State Prison Medical Staff Associations, Ronald Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Sikes et al
as 3:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Richard Gardner
Defendant:
Lt. Sikes and Hays Tactical Squad on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Hays State Prison et al
as 4:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dontavious Wooten
Defendant:
Hays State Prison, Sgt. Tipton and Unit Manager George Bradly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Judicial Qualifications Commission et al
as 1:2022cv04160
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Johnson
Defendant:
Judicial Qualifications Commission, Linda D. Hays and Newton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. GDC Hays State Prison et al
as 4:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Cross
Respondent:
GDOC Hays State Prison, Lt. Tullis, Team Unit Mag. James Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salaam v. Wan Hai Lines Ltd et al
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jafar Salaam
Defendant:
Wan Hai Lines Ltd and Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
SNELLING v. HAYS STATE PRISON
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
Hays State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNELLING v. HAYS STATE PRISON
as 5:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
HAYS STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
