Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Holcomb et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00579
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Holcomb and Hoke Holcomb, Jr.
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Belcher v. Hoke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03714
Petitioner: William David Belcher
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Plumley
as 2:2012cv01309
Petitioner: Steven A. Watkins
Respondent: Jim Rubenstein and Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Hoke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00892
Petitioner: Timothy Jared Austin
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Hoke
as 2:2011cv00095
Petitioner: Timothy Jared Austin
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Proctor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00159
Plaintiff: Donald Lee Taylor
Defendant: David Proctor, Tristan Tenney, Wexford Medical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Messer v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2011cv00079
Plaintiff: Raymond Charles Messer
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, Adrian Hoke and Debbie Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2011cv00159
Plaintiff: Arthur Allen
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, Adrian Hoke, William Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoke v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00643
Plaintiff: Douglas G. Hoke
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Slie v. Hoke et al
as 5:2011cv00121
Petitioner: Robert Slie
Respondent: Adrian Hoke and Mark A. Karl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?