Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Horton v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Geoffrey Townsend, Louis Avila, Pima County Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Horton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03521
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Antwan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00926
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
D.R. Horton Incorporated et al v. Main Street American Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00134
Defendant:
Main Street American Group Incorporated and NGM Insurance Company Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Unknown Parties, Continental Homes Incorporated, CHI Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03542
Plaintiff:
Stacey L Horton
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00634
Plaintiff:
Daniel Horton
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Jacobs and Unknown Agnew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Jacobs et al
as 2:2016cv03156
Petitioner:
Daniel Horton
Respondent:
Anne Jacobs and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Tony L Horton
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dehar #261420 v. Horton et al
as 2:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Donald Cory Dehar
Defendant:
Unknown Horton, Unknown Fiske, Josh Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zepeda-Zalaberry v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv02738
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda-Zalaberry
Defendant:
Dennis Smith, United States of America, R Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
