Cases 11 - 20 of 278
Hughes v. Tucker
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Monroe L. Hughes, III
Defendant:
Randy Tucker
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hughes v. H.J.S.
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Santanna N. Hughes
Defendant:
H.J.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Whitehead v. Urology P.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Dr. Kris Whitehead
Defendant:
Urology P.A., Urologic Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC, Dr. C. Stephen Farmer, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Hughes
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antonio Hughes
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hughes v. Forrest County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
James Hughes
Defendant:
Forrest County, Mississippi and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Misty Hughes, Veronica Bell, Charlie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Hughes
as 4:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dean Boyd
Defendant:
Misty Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shearer v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Hugh Shearer
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gates et al v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gates, Robert Hornsby, Cory Mooney and others
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bradley v. L.C.A.D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dr. Reginald D. Bradley
Defendant:
L.C.A.D.C., Mr. Sheriff Eddie Hawkins, C.O. Mr. Lennox Bartlet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
