Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
as 1:2015cv01167
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00812
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02418
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REYES-DILONE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
LUIS OSCAR REYES-DILONE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DEPARTMENT OF I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Habulembe v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2012cv00335
Petitioner:
Chuundu Mooba Habulembe
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General , U.S. Secretary of DHS , I.C.E. Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02005
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROWANN v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00360
Petitioner:
GEORGE M. ROWANN
Respondent:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN and BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT (I.C.E.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01745
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLOWE v. GINGERICH et al
as 1:2010cv00094
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID FLOWE
Respondent:
STEWART L. GINGERICH, THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
