Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Implus Footcare LLC v. Shoe Shields, LLC
as 4:2017cv00654
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare LLC
Defendant:
Shoe Shields, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Sequential Brands Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00382
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00343
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00342
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00339
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00282
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00244
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Maverick Sports Medicine, Inc. d/b/a Pro-Tec Athletics
as 5:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Maverick Sports Medicine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Implus Footcare, LLC v. Pivotal 5, LLC
as 5:2015cv00658
Plaintiff:
Implus Footcare, LLC
Defendant:
Pivotal 5, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
