Cases 11 - 20 of 22,638
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Keysor et al v. Uncle Julio's Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Audrey Keysor, Cyle Quick and Liv Wysocki
Defendant:
Uncle Julio's Corporation and The Mexican Restaurant, Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pace v. OneMain Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Value Plus, Inc. v. Cubework.com, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Value Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
Cubework.com, Inc. doing business as Superflea by Cubework.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Perficient, Inc. v. Draeger
as 4:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Perficient, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald Draeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
