Cases 11 - 20 of 116
McArthur v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Lucien McArthur
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Doctor Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Catherine C. Smith and Daniel J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Garcia v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Defendant:
J Smith, . Durbin, Andrew Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06207
Plaintiff:
Leslie J. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lopez v. City of Burbank et al
as 1:2022cv05074
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lopez
Defendant:
City of Burbank, Ofc. J Smith #6155 and Ofc. D. Myers #6140
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Darnell Howard
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Whatley v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2021cv06056
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Whatley
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Kazmi, Westerfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2021cv00567
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baity et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv01367
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray, Kevin Baity, April Ray and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
