Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
In re Subpoena Duces Tecum
as 3:2014mc00034
Petitioner: Phillip J Kavanaugh
Respondent: Eric Bramlet
Kareem Brown v. J. Kavanaugh, et al
as 13-16019
Plaintiff - Appellant: KAREEM LAMAR BROWN
Defendant - Appellee: J. KAVANAUGH, Lt. and M. GARCIA, Officer
Goudeau v. Aviva Life and Annuity Company et al
as 3:2013cv00292
Plaintiff: Susie Goudeau
Defendant: Aviva Life and Annuity Company , Michael J. Kavanaugh , Kevin Bernard Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Type: Contract Insurance
Otto v. Kavanaugh
as 3:2012cv02333
Defendant: Michael J. Kavanaugh
Plaintiff: Timothy Otto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stephen Reed v. C. James, et al
as 12-16920
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN CHARLES REED
Defendant - Appellee: C. JAMES, C/O, T. GONZALES, III, Sgt., F. MUNOZ, Lt. and others
James Cato, Jr. v. T. Avila, et al
as 12-16693
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES CATO, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: T. AVILA, J. KAVANAUGH, D. L. PATTERSON and others
Howard Young v. CDCR, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16491
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOWARD ALLEN YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. BARRON, J. LOPEZ and others
Smith v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv06715
Plaintiff: Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant: State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 3:2011cv06715
Plaintiff: Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant: State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saenz v. Chavez, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01872
Plaintiff: Robert Gonzales Saenz
Defendant: Frank X. Chavez, J. Kavanaugh, B. Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?