Cases 11 - 20 of 53
ALBERT v. J & R SLAW, INC.
as 5:2015cv05297
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ALBERT
Defendant:
J & R SLAW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY v. CORYELL et al
as 2:2015cv02534
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EDWARD CORYELL, SR., EDWARD CORYELL, JR., J. R. HOCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LATHAM v. S.C.I. GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2014cv03936
Plaintiff:
JOHN LATHAM
Defendant:
S.C.I. GRATERFORD, CORIZON HEALTH INC., JAFAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latham v. S.C.I. Graterford et al
as 3:2014cv01222
Plaintiff:
John Latham
Defendant:
S.C.I. Graterford, Corizon Health Inc., Jafar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEENAN v. J & R OF DELAWARE, INC.
as 2:2011cv00600
Plaintiff:
JOHN HEENAN
Defendant:
J & R OF DELAWARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
WEATHERLY et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv81067
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY, GILBRALTAR INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
J. R. WEATHERLY and CYNTHIA A. WEATHERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R. et al v. RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2009cv03041
Plaintiff:
M. R. and J. R.
Defendant:
RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT and JANET CENNAME
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Appeal From The Decision Of The Special Education Appeals Panel (IDEIA)
RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. R. et al
as 2:2009cv02503
Petitioner:
RIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Respondent:
M. R. and J. R.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
PENDLETON v. COOPER INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2009cv64222
Plaintiff:
J R PENDLETON, J R PENDLETON and J R PENDLETON
Defendant:
COOPER INDUSTRIES, DRESSER INDUSTRIES, BOMBARDIER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
