Cases 11 - 20 of 140
SMART Local 265 Welfare Fund et al v. Albert J. Wagner & Son, LLC
as 1:2022cv02651
Plaintiff:
SMART Local 265 Welfare Fund, SMART Local 265 Pension Fund, SMART Local 265 Joint Apprentice Training Committee and others
Defendant:
Albert J. Wagner & Son, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Coffman v. Zix Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12868
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, Mark J. Bonney, Marcy Campbell and others
Dunphy v. Zix Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10368
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunphy
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, David J. Wagner, Robert C. Hausmann and others
Kelley v. Zix Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10137
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kelley
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, David J. Wagner, Mark J. Bonney and others
Ramirez-Torres v. Highberger
as 6:2021cv01722
Plaintiff:
Jaime Ramirez-Torres
Defendant:
Josh Highberger, J. Wagner and Officer Laugenour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Grinberger v. Zix Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12817
Plaintiff:
Abraham Grinberger
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, Mark J. Bonney, Marcy Campbell and others
Ryan v. Zix Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv12835
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Zix Corporation, Mark J. Bonney, Marcy Campbell and others
Singh v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Defendant:
Krysta Lynch, Oregon Department of Corrections, L. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazzocchi v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2021cv04959
Plaintiff:
Frank Mazzocchi
Defendant:
Vivienne Gilbert, Esq., Bruce A. Cholst, Esq., Andrew J. Wagner, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
