Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Chmil et al v. Schneider et al
as 5:2014cv00944
Plaintiff:
Valentina Chmil and Nataliya Tsisyk
Defendant:
Thomas RJ Schneider, Western Express Inc, James H Crittenden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vargas v. Yuba City et al
as 2:2013cv01546
Defendant:
Yuba City, Todd Wolfe, Paul Hillegass and others
Plaintiff:
Elida Jaime Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Vargas et al
as 2:2013at00828
Defendant:
Elida Jaime Vargas, Yuba City, CA, Todd Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford et al v. Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Inc.
as 3:2012cv05918
Plaintiff:
Greg Crawford , Tracy Williams , Evangeline Macaraeg and others
Defendant:
Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
The Results Companies LLC v. Rococo Investments Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv61608
Plaintiff:
The Results Companies LLC
Defendant:
Rococo Investments Inc. and Jaime Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaime Vargas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70848
Petitioner:
JAIME MARTINEZ VARGAS, AKA Jaime Vargas Martinez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jaime Vargas-Montenegro v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72792
Petitioner:
JAIME VARGAS-MONTENEGRO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
United States of America v. Alvarez
as 10-1898
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Manny Alvarez, AKA Jaime Vargas Burgos, AKA Melvin Alvarez, AKA Melvin Vargas, AKA Andy Irizarry
Jaime Vargas Magallon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-72831
Petitioner:
JAIME VARGAS MAGALLON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Fernandez et al v. American Pro Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv22083
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Fernandez and Harold Montalvan
Defendant:
American Pro Services, Inc., Constanza Vargas and Jaime Vargas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
