Cases 11 - 20 of 31
David Russell v. Jimmy Bowman, et al
as 20-40662
Defendant / Appellee:
Jimmy Bowman, formerly known as Jimmy Bowmann and Vernon Mitchell
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Russell
Baughman v. Wainwright et al
as 1:2020cv01058
Defendant:
Johnathan Teaff, Michale Sizemore, Rachell West and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baughman v. Bowman et al Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 4:2020cv03588
Defendant:
Melissa Ballard, Johnathan Teaff, Vernon Mitchel and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baughman v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Johnathan Teaff, Rachell West, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Bowman et al
as 6:2019cv00314
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowmann, Vernon Mitchell and Jimmy Bowman
Plaintiff:
David Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogus v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, LeeAnn Spears-Hollis, Jimmy Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Brett David Bogus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2019cv00056
Plaintiff:
James White, Galvin Rice, James Woods and others
Defendant:
Tracy Pearson, Norris Jackson, Brain Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Stewart v. Cynthia Tilley, et al
as 19-50096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE STEWART
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED POLLARD, COREY FURR, ASSISTANT WARDEN JIMMY BOWMAN and others
Parsons v. Jackson et al
as 6:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
John Parsons
Defendant:
Norris Jackson, Michael Owens, Jimmy Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicker v. Jackson et al
as 6:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Daniel Wicker
Defendant:
Norris D Jackson, Jimmy Bowman, Michael . Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
