Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Mark Miller VS Jackie Crawford, et al.
as 3:2003cv00098
Defendant:
AWP, Jackie Crawford, Dr. Theodore D'Amico and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamaar Williams v. Jackie Crawford, et al
as 14-16723
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMAAR JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JACKIE CRAWFORD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Anthony Burriola v. Ted D'Amico, et al
as 13-16418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY J. BURRIOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
TED D'AMICO, CRAIG FARWELL, UNKOWN FLORES and others
Prison Legal News v. Cox et al
as 3:2013cv00346
Defendant:
Robert Bayer, James Greg Cox, Jackie Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillip Lyons v. Jackie Crawford, et al
as 13-16219
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP JACKSON LYONS
Respondent - Appellee:
JACKIE CRAWFORD and FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA
Phillip Lyons v. Jackie Crawford, et al
as 12-16822
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP JACKSON LYONS
Respondent - Appellee:
JACKIE CRAWFORD and FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA
-RAM PHILLIP JACKSON LYONS V. JACKIE CRAWFORD, ET AL.
as 3:1998cv00455
Respondent:
Jackie Crawford and Frankie Sue Del Papa
Petitioner:
Phillip Jackson Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward Seely v. Jim Gibbons, et al
as 12-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM GIBBONS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
MARK ROGERS V. E.K. MCDANIEL, ET AL.
as 3:2002cv00342
Respondent:
Jackie Crawford, Frankie Sue Del Papa and E.K. McDaniel
Petitioner:
Mark Rogers
Unknown:
Mary Beth Gardner and Brian Abbington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricky Grundy v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 11-16136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LEE GRUNDY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, GREG COX, BRUCE BANNESTER, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
