Cases 11 - 20 of 254
Slaikeu v. Quinn et al
as 3:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Slaikeu
Defendant:
Quinn, James Milburn and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Borough of Petersburg et al
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
James Kerr
Defendant:
Borough of Petersburg and Stephen Giesbrecht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. State of Alaska
as 1:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
James D. Harmon
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WINTERS et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
JAMES WINTERS and LINH THI TRUC NGO
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Slaikeu v. Milburn
as 3:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Jonathan Alexander Slaikeu
Respondent:
James Milburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teas v. State of Alaska et al
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roger Teas
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, James Milburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicori v. Viator et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Nicori
Defendant:
Brandon Viator, John O. Putikka, Rachel Duvlea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
James v. Goose Creek Correctional Center & DOC
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Goose Creek Correctional Center & DOC
James v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Kari Lynn James
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cloninger v. The Original Case Worker et al
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Sam Cloninger
Defendant:
The Original Case Worker, Sidney K. Billingslea, William F. Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
