Cases 11 - 20 of 4,963
Ealom v. University Circle Police Department et al.
as 1:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Ealom
Defendant:
University Circle Police Department, Judson Manor/Judson Senior Living/Judson Senior Living Communities, Glover Roston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02592
Plaintiff:
James E. Smith, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lambert v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02536
Plaintiff:
James Lambert, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tuggle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
James Tuggle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02505
Plaintiff:
James Stein
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marathas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02540
Plaintiff:
James Marathas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barsh v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
James Barsh
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Donovan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02529
Plaintiff:
James Donovan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jacka v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02539
Plaintiff:
James Jacka
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Browning v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
James Dean Browning
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
