Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Smith v. USA
as 1:2018cv01860
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Elias Chavando v. Plasma Igniter, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01413
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 inclusive, John Ferchill, Douglas Benns and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Chavando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Hellmuth v. Hood et al
as 1:2018cv00397
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Hellmuth
Defendant:
Leanne Hood , Chelsey Holland , Jamy Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Rohrs, Dona Powell, United Telephone Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Commissioner:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Smith v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 2:2016cv00533
Petitioner:
James H Smith
Respondent:
Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01275
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E I DuPont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Smith
Defendant:
E I DuPont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Biro v. City of Avon et al
as 1:2012cv02990
Defendant:
City of Avon , Sandy Martin , Gerald Plas and others
Plaintiff:
William Biro and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Robbins & Myers Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
James Robert Smith
Defendant:
Robbins & Myers Inc, Peter C Wallace, Thomas P Loftis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv00362
Plaintiff:
R. Anthony Cook
Defendant:
James H. Smith, Spike Industries, Inc., Keweenaw Industries, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
