Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Jones v. Owen et al
as 8:2012cv03018
Plaintiff:
James B Jones
Defendant:
John Owen, A W Langford, NFN Birchler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Jones v. Rivera
as 4:2012cv02062
Petitioner:
James Howard Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Mildred L Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Owens et al
as 8:2012cv01035
Plaintiff:
James B Jones
Defendant:
John R Owens, Ms Merritt, Stephen Lansford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rollerson v. LINQ Industrial Fabrics Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02310
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rollerson , Patrick Stevens , Mary Green and others
Defendant:
LINQ Industrial Fabrics Inc , Textene LLC and Carlos Echeverria
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Carlos Echeverria
Thirdparty_defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Medtronic Inc
as 3:2010cv01795
Plaintiff:
James E Jones
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. USA
as 4:2010cv70156
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Eric Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. United States Department of Justice
as 0:2009cv02802
Plaintiff:
James E Jones
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Continental Casualty Company v. Jones et al
as 3:2009cv01004
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
James R Jones, II, Carolina Jones, Elizabeth Leitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jones v. SC Department of Corrections Headquarters
as 4:2008cv03612
Plaintiff:
James R Jones
Defendant:
SC Department of Corrections Headquarters
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. USA
as 8:2008cv70070
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Albert Jones
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
