Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Blevins v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2010cv03216
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Blevins
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker and Dr Bates
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03217
Plaintiff:
Waylen Craig Bradford
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03112
Plaintiff:
David Keith Dotson
Defendant:
James Baker, Courtney Ransom, Tom Watson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Lawrence County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2010cv01800
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Lawrence County Sheriffs Department, James Baker and Gene Mitchell
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelso v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
Rocky Marquis Kelso
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell and James Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Free v. Baker et al
as 2:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Billy Free
Defendant:
James Baker, R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLC, R & L Transportation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Harrison v. Baker et al
as 5:2008cv01407
Plaintiff:
Steven Harrison, Sr.
Defendant:
James Baker and Lawrence County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swoopes v. Baker
as 5:2008cv01406
Plaintiff:
James Albert Swoopes
Defendant:
James Baker and Matt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Metcalf et al v. Osborn et al
as 5:2007cv01979
Plaintiff:
Ivan Quintel Metcalf and Joseph Wofford
Defendant:
Jim Osborn, Gene Mitchelle, Kenneth Mitchelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wofford v. Osborn et al
as 5:2007cv01982
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gibbs Wofford and Ivan Metcalf
Defendant:
Jim Osborn, Gene Mitchelle and James Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
