Cases 11 - 18 of 18
LOISELLE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv02920
Plaintiff:
JAZMINE LOISELLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUHAMMAD v. COMMUNITY COACH, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv08344
Plaintiff:
KALEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
COMMUNITY COACH, INC. , COACH USA, INC. , STAGECOACH GROUP, P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
DEGROAT et al v. COOPER et al
as 2:2013cv07779
Plaintiff:
WILBUR C. DEGROAT, III , ARLITTA DEGROAT , LEON DEGROAT and others
Defendant:
SCOTT COOPER, BRAD INGLESBY, RELATIVITY MEDIA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRILLO et al v. 48TH STREET WEEHAWKEN LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06229
Plaintiff:
EUGENIO CARRILLO , BEATRIZ CARRILLO , DAVID DIFABIO and others
Defendant:
48TH STREET WEEHAWKEN LLC, ERNEST GARCIA, JR., ROBERT BARSA and others
Cross_claimant:
MARK GOULD and MARK GOULD ARCHITECT
Cross_defendant:
48TH STREET WEEHAWKEN LLC, AC CONSTRUCTION CORP., RICHARD BARSA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FORTENBERRY v. CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
as 2:2013cv01640
Plaintiff:
JAZMINE FORTENBERRY
Defendant:
CITY OF ELIZABETH , ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT and WILL TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ORTIZ et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv01682
Plaintiff:
CARLA ORTIZ and JAZMIN L. GRIER
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, JAVIER FELICIANO, CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCANN et al v. WINSLOW TWP. et al
as 1:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
ALVIN MCCANN, VANESSA MCCANN, JONAH DAVIS and others
Defendant:
WINSLOW TWP., WINSLOW TWP., WINSLOW TWP. POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
