Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Murray v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv01261
Petitioner:
Kenneth Murray
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tippens v. McDonnell et al
as 3:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert McDonnell, Harold W. Clarke and Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roulhac v. Clarke et al
as 3:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Clarence Roulhac, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Linda Shields, Carl Marrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sears v. Dillman
as 1:2012cv00942
Petitioner:
Richard Wayne Sears
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wang et al
as 7:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee Smith
Defendant:
Lawrence Wang, A. Giles, P. McHalko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Dillman
as 3:2009cv00510
Petitioner:
Nery Arnoldo Salinas
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howerton v. Dillman et al
as 7:2009cv00237
Petitioner:
Lawrence Donal Howerton, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman and Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howerton v. Dillman et al
as 2:2009cv00284
Petitioner:
Lawrence Donal Howerton, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman and Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
