Cases 11 - 20 of 3,005
NAHAS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv01252
Defendant:
ARTHUR JEFFREY, INC., CITY OF PITTSBURGH, OFFICER EMILY SHIELDS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NAHAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nahas v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Administrator Michael Nahas
Defendant:
Arthur Jeffrey, Inc., JANE DOE, Zacariah Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARIN v. WPVI-TV/6ABC et al
as 2:2024cv04594
Defendant:
JEFFREY ROSEN, WARNER BROTHERS DISCOVERY, INC., THE CABLE NEWS NETWORK and others
Plaintiff:
MEL MARIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
JLC v. Stefanide et al
as 2:2024cv04517
Defendant:
Theresa Butts, JOHN DOE, Jeffrey Costa and others
Plaintiff:
JLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BURKHALTER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04397
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BURKHALTER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marangi v. Sage
as 2:2024cv04135
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Marangi
Defendant:
James Sage
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
OCKLEY v. RADNOR TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv04070
Defendant:
BRIAN BROWN, BRADY MCHALE, ROCKWELL GLYNN LP and others
Plaintiff:
SIMONA OCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
XU v. BILAL et al
as 2:2024cv04113
Defendant:
JEFFREY HANS, DETECTIVE JOSEPH FARGNOLI, ROCHELLE BILAL and others
Plaintiff:
LIRON XU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
HUTCHINS et al v. NOVO NORDISK INC.
as 2:2024cv03914
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HUTCHINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
