Cases 11 - 20 of 36
BRUNS et al v. USAA et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
MARK A. DAVIS, ROBERT WILKIE, DALTON BRYANT, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNY BRUNS and JEREMY BRUNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHIEBER v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2020cv00264
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
JENNY SCHIEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO COOKE LEGAL GROUP, PLLC et al
as 1:2019mc00148
Not Yet Classified:
COOKE LEGAL GROUP, PLLC
Plaintiff:
TEHSIN KHALIQ, KAMRAN KHALIQ, RIZWAN KHALIQ and others
In Re:
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO COOKE LEGAL GROUP, PLLC
GIEDT et al v. USA SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00570
Plaintiff:
Davis Geidt and Jenny Zha
Defendant:
Israel Sayag, USA Services, LLC and Gil Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ACETO et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv00464
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ACETO, SANDRA CALDWELL BLANTON, JENNY SILLS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
CLERMONT v. SOOTER et al
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
JAKE FERRER, RICCARDO MARTINEZ, DEVIN COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EMIL CLERMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDOX v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv02962
Plaintiff:
JENNY MADDOX
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITSKOG v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00611
Plaintiff:
MARNE K. MITSKOG
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JENNIE L. KNEEDLER, STEPHEN J. BUCKINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
