Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Arbuckle et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01242
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brown, Amy Dawn Beard, Jonathan Brownlee and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2017cv01559
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jessie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
Jessie L. Brown and Johnnie Brown
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Betroch v. Betroch et al
as 1:2016cv00712
Plaintiff:
Jessie Betroch and Cindy Betroch
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
P. et al v. Campus Community School
as 1:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
M. P. , Jessie P. and Ronald P.
Defendant:
Campus Community School
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Rayna P. et al. v. Campus Community School
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Rayna P. , Jessie P. and Ronald P.
Defendant:
Campus Community School
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Brett v. Unknown
as 1:2013mc00338
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Jessie Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Walker v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jessie E. Walker
Defendant:
Raphael Williams, Stan Taylor and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Williams et al
as 1:2007cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jessie E. Walker
Defendant:
Ralpheal Williams, Stan Taylor, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
