Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 22-6103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Stinson v. Fowlkes, et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oka Nashoba Chikashah Nation v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv02448
Plaintiff:
Oka Nashoba Chikashah Nation and Chief Nowanaki Yanash, Kyle Watkins also known as Chief Eagle Eye, Katrian Green-Watkins and Coosa Nation of North America (USA), a sister Nation and Juridical Personality
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, Regina Morrison Newman, Gregory S. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Muhammad et al v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv02053
Plaintiff:
Faatimah Muhammad and Wellsprings Abundant Ministry Trust
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, Douglas M. Alrutz, Charles Shoffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Stinson v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 21-5904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK STINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., Assistant U.S. Attorney, NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Divison and others
Stinson v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2021cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Arthur E. Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Stinson v. John Folkes, et al
as 20-5385
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEDAE L. JENKINS, Judge, ARTHUR E. QUINN, Attorney at Trial, JOHN T. FOLKES, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK STINSON
Stinson v. Folkes et al
as 2:2019cv02867
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, John T. Folkes, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
