Cases 11 - 18 of 18
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv02373
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
BOYLE v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv03655
Plaintiff:
DESMOND BOYLE
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION, TARGET STORES, EDGEWATER RETIREMENT PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv01917
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
EDWARDS v. FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2007cv04763
Plaintiff:
KERRY EDWARDS
Defendant:
FREEHOLD TOWNSHIP, JAMES B. BURDGE, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2007cv03969
Plaintiff:
JAMES HALL
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS, JOHN DOES 1-10, THOMAS BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOSKOWITZ v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2007cv03120
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOSKOWITZ
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS, MICHAEL FRAAS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KATZ et al v. BALLY'S PARK PLACE , INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01885
Plaintiff:
MARLENE KATZ and HERBERT KATZ
Defendant:
BALLY'S PARK PLACE , INC., BALLY'S ATLANTIC CITY, CEASAR ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MANELSKI et al v. TINICUM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2007cv01487
Plaintiff:
DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI and others
Defendant:
TINICUM TOWNSHIP, TINICUM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETER J. BILLBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
