Cases 11 - 20 of 47
USA v. Jorge Barriga Guzman
as 21-50022
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE BARRIGA GUZMAN, AKA Jorge Barriga, AKA Jorge Gomez Barriga, AKA Jorge Guzman, AKA Jorge Guzman Barriga, AKA Rodrigo Lopez Sarabia, AKA Ramon Sarabia Lopez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GUZMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03887
Plaintiff:
JORGE GUZMAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Jorge Guzman-Araujo
as 20-2615
Defendant / Appellant:
Jorge Guzman-Araujo, also known as Luciano Lopez Valenzuela, also known as Jorge Guzman, also known as Luciano Valenzuela Lopez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
GUZMAN ARROYO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71719
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GUZMAN ARROYO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Guzmn-Prez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv01209
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jorge Guzman-Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hernandez v. National Express Transit Corporation et al
as 1:2017at00355
Plaintiff:
Jorge Guzman Hernandez
Defendant:
National Express Transit Corporation and Daniel Klemple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez v. National Express Transit Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00610
Plaintiff:
Jorge Guzman Hernandez
Defendant:
Daniel Klemple and National Express Transit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
