Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01547
Defendant: ERIC BRENNEN, SOUTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, MARK S. ZEMELMAN and others
Plaintiff: ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01005
Plaintiff: ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAREN MITCHELL, U.S. DISTRICT COURT CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DURU v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2017cv00927
Defendant: FELICIA PITRE, U.S. CIVIL CASE ADMINISTRATORS, KERRY KOHNEN and others
Plaintiff: ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DURU v. MITCHELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00504
Plaintiff: ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant: KAREN MITCHELL, DOJ/OIG/HHS - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ATLANTA GEORGIA, MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01493
Defendant: ANTHEM, INC, CIGNA CORP. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Petitioner: KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN, INC., TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., MERCER and others
Special Master: RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01189
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LURIE v. MID-ATLANTIC PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.
as 1:2008cv01949
Plaintiff: DEAN KEVIN LURIE
Defendant: MID-ATLANTIC PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, P.C. (MAPMG) doing business as KAISER PERMANENTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ECKLEY v. KAISER PERMANENTE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00169
Defendant: KAISER PERMANENTE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS A. ECKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?