Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Isaiah Harris v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 24-3294
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, in her individual and official capacity as Director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, WARDEN KENNETH BLACK, in his individual and official capacity as Warden of the Richland Correctional Institution and JOHN AND JANE DOE, 1-10; in their individual and official capacity as Mailroom Staff, Clerks, and Supervisors of the Richland Correctional Institution
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Marchak, Jr. v. Kenneth Black
as 24-3182
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MARCHAK, JR.
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Terrence Robinson-Bey v. Kenneth Black
as 24-3099
Petitioner:
TERRENCE LEMAR ROBINSON-BEY
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden
Cooper v. Black
as 5:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Keith R. Cooper
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Black
as 1:2023cv02368
Petitioner:
Curtis L. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estephen Castellon v. Kenneth Black
as 23-3956
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESTEPHEN CASTELLON
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Frederick Hill v. Kenneth Black
as 23-3929
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK M. HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN KENNETH BLACK
Harris v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 1:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
Isaiah S. Harris, Sr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth KirksIn re: Kenneth Kirks
as 23-3781
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH M. KIRKS
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
