Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fassina, et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al
as 26-8012
Respondent:
JANICE FASSINA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STEVEN EDELEN, KENNETH BLACK and others
Petitioner:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, LM INSURANCE CORPORATION, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
HEATHER TRYON and JOSHUA TRYON
Black v. Odom et al
as 3:2025cv00152
Plaintiff:
Zachary Kenneth Black
Defendant:
C.O. Odom, C.O. Thomas, Srg. Karren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson Bullock v. Black
as 5:2024cv01379
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Petitioner:
Jamal L. Thompson Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry HeflinIn re: Jerry Heflin
as 24-3652
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: JERRY JERMAINE HEFLIN
Lorenzo HarrisonIn re: Lorenzo Harrison
as 24-3440
Petitioner:
In re: LORENZO HARRISON
Respondent:
KENNETH BLACK
Gillespie v. Chambers-Smith, et al.
as 1:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Alan Gillespie
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black, John Doe 1-4 and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio - IP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Black
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner:
Earl C. Jefferson, II
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Black and Marie Morilus-Black
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Black et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation
as 8:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Black and Marie Morilus-Black
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
