Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Gillespie v. Chambers-Smith, et al.
as 1:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Alan Gillespie
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Black
as 1:2024cv00729
Petitioner:
Earl C. Jefferson, II
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Black
as 5:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Keith R. Cooper
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Black
as 1:2023cv02368
Petitioner:
Curtis L. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 1:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
Isaiah S. Harris, Sr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis, Jr. v. Black
as 1:2023cv01627
Petitioner:
Gregory J. Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillespie v. DeWine et al
as 1:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Alan Gillespie
Defendant:
Richard Michael DeWine, Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith
as 1:2023cv01365
Petitioner:
Marlon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black and Director Annette Chambers-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Onunwor v. Black
as 1:2023cv00810
Petitioner:
Clifton C. Onunwor
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
