Cases 11 - 20 of 38
ROLAND v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01351
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
STACEY ROLAND
Unknown:
Michael D. Bell and Kevin J. Boissoneault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barclay v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Barclay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mamon v. Superintendent
as 3:2014cv02060
Petitioner:
Kevin J Mamon
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAMON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2014cv01675
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARPENTER v. SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2014cv00305
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. CARPENTER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loveless v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Loveless
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MAMON v. CRAIG et al
as 1:2014cv00428
Defendant:
ANDY CRAIG, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, VICKI MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAMON v. COCKRELL et al
as 1:2013cv01865
Respondent:
DALE COCKRELL and WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAMON v. GARRITY et al
as 1:2013cv01740
Defendant:
JORDAN CONLEY, ANDY CRAIG, RYAN GARRITY and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Learn et al
as 4:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Matthew Chapman
Defendant:
Kevin J Learn and Nestle Transportation Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
