Cases 11 - 20 of 188
King v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 6:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Robert King
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
Clayton Orville King
Defendant:
United States of America and State Auditors for Taxes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gordon v. Singh et al
as 5:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Shelbydale Gordon
Defendant:
Malkit Singh and Kings Truckline Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ra'Terrius King
Defendant:
John Tjeerdsma, Jeffery Gatwood, Tulsa County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 5:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Chad King and Jennifer King
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Blackburn et al v. Webb et al
as 5:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Tyeashia M Blackburn, Lezlie E Freeman and Nylivia R Purcell
Defendant:
Kelly Webb and Rent King LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
King v. United States District Court
as 5:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Clayton Orville King
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene King
Defendant:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
