Cases 11 - 20 of 21
MACMILLAN-BELL v. KANG et al
as 2:2015cv05411
Plaintiff:
CLARE MACMILLAN-BELL
Defendant:
PETER KANG , ALLBETTERCARE URGENT CARE CENTER , JENNIFER BRAUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC v. BEHRINGER MALONEY
as 2:2015cv01645
Plaintiff:
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC
Defendant:
MARGARET BEHRINGER MALONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JIN v. EXECUTIVE BRANCH CHIEF et al
as 2:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
KANG HYONG JIN and HAE SOOK PARK
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE BRANCH CHIEF, JEH JOHNSON, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KANG et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04010
Plaintiff:
BIN KANG, PHD and YAN YAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEPT. OF PROBATION OFFICE, TIMOTHY DYCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FISCHER et al v. KANG TRANSPORT, INC et al
as 2:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
MARLON FISCHER and LYNDA FISCHER
Defendant:
KANG TRANSPORT, INC and KULVIR SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JHANG et al v. KIM et al
as 2:2013cv06359
Plaintiff:
MYONG JA JHANG, KATHLEEN BANG WHAN CHANG and DONG IL KIM
Defendant:
PAUL DONG UK KIM, HAEKYONG KIM, KYUNG SOON KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIM v. KANG et al
as 2:2012cv01049
Plaintiff:
HYUNG Y. KIM and JEFFREY J. YIM
Defendant:
HEE O. KANG and HAIR CITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KANG et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv35730
Plaintiff:
SOON C KANG and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
XYNATECH, INC. et al v. XYNATECH, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv05940
Plaintiff:
XYNATECH, INC. , JAMES T. REDD and PIERSON KANG
Defendant:
XYNATECH, LLC and MADERN INVESTMENT USA, GP
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
LI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv03965
Plaintiff:
XIN KANG LI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
