Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Sanchez v. Bird
as 4:2022cv09106
Petitioner:
Jacinto Sanchez
Respondent:
L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce Richard Senator v. L. Bird
as 8:2022cv02094
Petitioner:
Bruce Richard Senator
Respondent:
L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Witkin v. Chapnick et al
as 2:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Witkin
Defendant:
Dr. Chapnick, L. Bird, Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bird et al v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Chester L Bird, Ryan A Brown and Richard B Dague
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Daniel Shannon, Michael Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Witkin v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv01310
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Witkin
Defendant:
R. Thomas, L. Bird, K. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Thompson v. Bird
as 2:2022cv01196
Petitioner:
Raft Thompson and Raft L. Thompson
Respondent:
Unknown and L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herrick Lundie v. L. Bird
as 2:2022cv05082
Petitioner:
Herrick Lundie
Respondent:
L Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lundie v. Bird
as 2:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
Herrick Lundie
Respondent:
L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Bird
as 4:2022cv02747
Petitioner:
Lamont N. Moore
Respondent:
Warden L. Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bird, et al v. Martinez-Ellis, et al
as 22-8012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHESTER L. BIRD, RYAN A. BROWN and RICHARD B. DAUGE
Defendant / Appellee:
MELANIE MARTINEZ-ELLIS, RN, Health Services Administrator and MICHAEL PACHECO, Warden, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution, in their individual capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
