Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Hill v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00617
Plaintiff:
Brian L Hill
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Hargrove et al
as 4:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Joseph Hargrove, Jr, Sharon L Hill and All occupants of 5426 Santa Chase Lane, Sugarland, TX 77479
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Hargrove et al
as 4:2011mc00021
Defendant:
Joseph Hargrove, Jr and Sharon L Hill
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Griffin v. Public Access Community Television et al
as 1:2010cv00602
Defendant:
Natomi A. Austin, Cathy Beaudoin, Helene Caudill and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hill v. Nextel of Texas, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01324
Plaintiff:
Sandra L Hill
Defendant:
Nextel of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Samba v. Jordan Carriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00337
Plaintiff:
Adama Samba
Defendant:
Jordan Carriers, Inc. and Joe L Hill, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hargrove et al v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc et al
as 4:2009cv01617
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hargrove, Jr and Sharon L Hill
Defendant:
Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc, Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, Mann & Stevens, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Hill et al v. Jarvis et al
as 6:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bobbie L. Hill and Ray C. Hill
Defendant:
Jo Ellen Jarvis, Newell S. Jarvis, John R. Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
