Cases 11 - 20 of 622
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01135
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Hatton
as 3:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Jones
Defendant:
Karen D. Hatton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Wiley et al
as 8:2022cv02159
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Corporal Wiley, Deputy Statsny, Corporal Brinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12680
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEVI JONES and JUSTIN L JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Gary Bell
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Julie L. Jones, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hail v. Dixon et al
as 8:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
M. J. Christian Hail
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, State of Florida, Mark S. Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C SMITH, CHRISTINE ABIZAID and ROBIN ASHTON
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS and JASON L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Deloach et al
as 3:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Jones
Defendant:
Sgt. Walter S. Deloach, Correctional Officer Carlton, P. D. Carty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Cole et al
as 6:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Eddie Cole, Ofc. Robert L. Jones, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
